Microsporum canis is a pathogenic, asexual fungus in the phylum Ascomycota, class Eurotiomycetes, order Onygenales and family Arthrodermataceae, named by E. Bodin in 1902 and found worldwide. It reproduces through two conidial forms, large spindle-shaped macroconidia and small single-celled microconidia, and despite its name its natural host is the domestic cat rather than the dog, though it can also colonize dogs and horses, with long-haired cats often serving as symptomless carriers. In humans and animals it infects the upper dead layers of skin, causing tinea capitis and tinea corporis, ringworm-type infections marked by inflammatory lesions and, in some cases, hair loss. Humans become infected mainly through direct or indirect contact with infected pets. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Relationship to People Scientific Name Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Wikidata: Microsporum canis
Sources
1. Microsporum canis (Wikipedia)
- Wikidata Q140376 (P225 taxon name)
Article text
Microsporum canis is a pathogenic, asexual fungus in the phylum Ascomycota that infects the upper, dead layers of skin on domesticated cats, and occasionally dogs and humans.
Article text: "Microsporum canis is a pathogenic, asexual fungu"
Microsporum canis is a pathogenic, asexual fungus in the phylum Ascomycota that infects the upper, dead layers of skin on domesticated cats, and occasionally dogs and humans.
View the Source2. GBIF Species API
3. GBIF (IUCN Red List category): GBIF IUCN Red List category for Microsporum canis
GBIF (IUCN Red List category)GBIF taxon key 7252793, category fieldQuote, GBIF taxon key 7252793, category field
"category": "NOT_EVALUATED"
View the Source IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
Wikidata: Microsporum canis
Child Taxon Of: Eurotiomycetes, Wikidata parent-taxon (P171) chainView the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.