Protororqualus cuvieri, originally spelled cuvierii, is an extinct rorqual from the late Pliocene (Piacenzian, 3.6 to 2.6 million years ago) of Mount Pulgnasco, Italy, and the type species of the genus Protororqualus. It was first described in 1829 as a species of Balaena, later moved to the Belgian genus Plesiocetus and then to Balaenoptera, and some authors treated it as a Cetotherium, until later work showed the Mount Pulgnasco skeleton was distinct enough to deserve its own genus. A 2007 analysis by Bisconti identified it as a late survivor among primitive rorquals in the Mediterranean. Its dentary is straighter than the bowed dentaries of living rorquals, so it probably could not perform their intermittent ram feeding.
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Living or Extinct Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Paleobiology Database: Paleobiology Database taxon record: Protororqualus cuvieri
In Biome
Marine, Biomes Source Paleobiology Database: Paleobiology Database taxon record: Protororqualus cuvieri
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source Protororqualus (Wikipedia)Lead, where foundQuote, Lead, where found
is a genus of extinct rorqual from the late Pliocene (Piacenzian, 3.6 to 2.6 Ma) of Mount Pulgnasco, Italy
Sources
1. Paleobiology Database: Paleobiology Database taxon record: Protororqualus cuvieri
Paleobiology DatabaseExtant flag (ext), 0 means not extant
"ext": "0"
Extant flag (ext), extinct status
"ext": "0"
Ecospace, diet (jdt)
"jdt": "suspension feeder"
Ecospace, environment (jev)
"jev": "marine"
In Biome: Marine, Ecospace, environment (jev), biome
"jev": "marine"
Child Taxon Of: Balaenopteridae, Classification, family (fml)
"fml": "Balaenopteridae"
View the Source Protororqualus (Wikipedia)
Lead, where found
is a genus of extinct rorqual from the late Pliocene (Piacenzian, 3.6 to 2.6 Ma) of Mount Pulgnasco, Italy
In Group: Cetaceans (Whales, Dolphins and Porpoises), Lead
is a genus of extinct rorqual
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.