Oxydactylus benedentatus is an extinct species of camelid, a member of the family Camelidae in the genus Oxydactylus. It was first described by Hay in 1924 and has since been placed in the genus Oxydactylus. The database dates the species to the Burdigalian stage, between about 18.5 and 16.3 million years ago, from 3 fossil occurrence(s), collected in the United States (Texas). Its ecospace record gives a terrestrial, ground-dwelling way of life and a browsing diet, values the database takes from the wider Camelidae clade, since fossils of the species itself do not show how it fed. The Wikipedia article on Oxydactylus, read for the genus, describes it as an extinct genus of camelid endemic to North America. The GBIF backbone taxonomy lists Oxydactylus benedentatus as an accepted species of the family Camelidae, which is the second source for the name.
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Living or Extinct Scientific NameOxydactylus benedentatus 2 Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Oxydactylus benedentatus (Paleobiology Database)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Oxydactylus benedentatusOccurrence record, placeQuote, Occurrence record, place
"state": "Texas"
Sources
1. Oxydactylus benedentatus (Paleobiology Database)
Taxon record, extant status (extinct)
"is_extant": "extinct"
Ecospace record, environment
"taxon_environment": "terrestrial"
Ecospace record, diet, taken from the clade
"diet": "browser, browser"
Child Taxon Of: Camelidae, Classification, family
"family": "Camelidae"
In Group: Even-Toed Ungulates (Artiodactyla), Classification, order
"order": "Artiodactyla"
View the Source2. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility): GBIF Backbone Taxonomy match for Oxydactylus benedentatus
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)Backbone match, canonical nameQuote, Backbone match, canonical name
"canonicalName": "Oxydactylus benedentatus"
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.