Nature Atlas

How Nature Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Specy

Cordyceps Militaris

Fungi

Cordyceps militaris, commonly known as the caterpillar fungus, is a species of fungus in the family Cordycipitaceae and the type species of the genus Cordyceps, which comprises hundreds of species. It was originally described by Carl Linnaeus in 1753 as Clavaria militaris. It parasitizes insects and is used in traditional Chinese medicine.

Facts
Classification
Diet
Parasitic 1
System (Realm)
Terrestrial 1
Relationship to People
Used in Traditional Medicine 1
Living or Extinct
Yes 2
Scientific Name
Cordyceps militaris 4
Conservation Status
Not Evaluated 5
Comparison
NatureServe Rank
GNR Unranked 3
Connections

Child Taxon Of

Sordariomycetes, Taxa
Source Wikidata: Cordyceps Militaris

In Biome

Grassland, Biomes
Source First Nature: Cordyceps militaris fungus page
In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Sources
1. GBIF Species API
GBIF Species APIView the Source
2. Wikidata (taxon extant/extinct status)
Wikimedia Foundation / Wikidata contributorsQ2118699, descriptionView the Source
3. NatureServe Explorer: Cordyceps militaris
NatureServe ExplorerGlobal rank (roundedGRank)
Quote, Global rank (roundedGRank)
"roundedGRank": "GNR"
View the Source
4. Wikidata: Cordyceps Militaris
Child Taxon Of: Sordariomycetes, Wikidata parent-taxon (P171) chainView the Source
5. GBIF (IUCN Red List category): GBIF IUCN Red List category for Cordyceps militaris
GBIF (IUCN Red List category)GBIF taxon key 7567077, category field
Quote, GBIF taxon key 7567077, category field
"category": "NOT_EVALUATED"
View the Source
First Nature: Cordyceps militaris fungus page
First NatureIn Biome: Grassland, Habitat and ecological role
Quote, In Biome: Grassland, Habitat and ecological role
In grassland or on mossy woodland edges, always attached to a moth pupa (or exceptionally to a larva) below the ground.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.