Gentilicamelus sternbergi is an extinct species of camelid, a member of the family Camelidae in the genus Gentilicamelus. It was first described by Cope in 1879 and has since been placed in the genus Gentilicamelus. The database dates the species from the Rupelian to the Burdigalian stage, between about 29.5 and 16.3 million years ago, from 9 fossil occurrences, collected in the United States (Oregon). Its ecospace record gives a terrestrial, ground-dwelling way of life and a browsing diet, values the database takes from the wider Camelidae clade, since fossils of the species itself do not show how it fed. The Wikipedia article on Gentilicamelus, read for the genus, describes it as an extinct genus of camelid endemic to North America. The GBIF backbone taxonomy lists Gentilicamelus sternbergi as an accepted species of the family Camelidae, which is the second source for the name.
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Living or Extinct Scientific NameGentilicamelus sternbergi 2 Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Gentilicamelus sternbergi (Paleobiology Database)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Gentilicamelus sternbergiOccurrence record, placeQuote, Occurrence record, place
"state": "Oregon"
Sources
1. Gentilicamelus sternbergi (Paleobiology Database)
Taxon record, extant status (extinct)
"is_extant": "extinct"
Ecospace record, environment
"taxon_environment": "terrestrial"
Ecospace record, diet, taken from the clade
"diet": "browser, browser"
Child Taxon Of: Camelidae, Classification, family
"family": "Camelidae"
In Group: Even-Toed Ungulates (Artiodactyla), Classification, order
"order": "Artiodactyla"
View the Source2. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility): GBIF Backbone Taxonomy match for Gentilicamelus sternbergi
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)Backbone match, canonical nameQuote, Backbone match, canonical name
"canonicalName": "Gentilicamelus sternbergi"
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.