Megacamelus merriami is an extinct species of camelid, a member of the family Camelidae in the genus Megacamelus. It was first described by Frick in 1921 and has since been placed in the genus Megacamelus. The database dates the species from the Tortonian to the Zanclean stage, between about 9.4 and 4.7 million years ago, from 3 fossil occurrences, collected in the United States (Nebraska, California). Its ecospace record gives a terrestrial, ground-dwelling way of life and a browsing diet, values the database takes from the wider Camelidae clade, since fossils of the species itself do not show how it fed. The GBIF backbone taxonomy lists Megacamelus merriami as an accepted species of the family Camelidae, which is the second source for the name.
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Living or Extinct Scientific Name Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Megacamelus merriami (Paleobiology Database)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Megacamelus merriamiOccurrence record, placeQuote, Occurrence record, place
"state": "California"
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Megacamelus merriamiOccurrence record, placeQuote, Occurrence record, place
"state": "Nebraska"
Sources
1. Megacamelus merriami (Paleobiology Database)
Taxon record, extant status (extinct)
"is_extant": "extinct"
Ecospace record, environment
"taxon_environment": "terrestrial"
Ecospace record, diet, taken from the clade
"diet": "browser, browser"
Child Taxon Of: Camelidae, Classification, family
"family": "Camelidae"
In Group: Even-Toed Ungulates (Artiodactyla), Classification, order
"order": "Artiodactyla"
View the Source2. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility): GBIF Backbone Taxonomy match for Megacamelus merriami
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)Backbone match, canonical nameQuote, Backbone match, canonical name
"canonicalName": "Megacamelus merriami"
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.