Nature Atlas

How Nature Works
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Specy

Palaeolama paradoxa

Mammals

Palaeolama paradoxa is an extinct species of camelid, a member of the family Camelidae in the genus Palaeolama. It was named by Cabrera in 1935, and the Paleobiology Database, which files it under the nominate subgenus Palaeolama, dates it from the Chibanian stage of the Middle Pleistocene to the Late Pleistocene, between about 400,000 and 11,700 years ago, from a single fossil occurrence in Uruguay. The database lists it as an extinct member of the even-toed ungulates with a terrestrial, ground-dwelling way of life and a browsing diet, values it takes from the wider group, and the GBIF backbone taxonomy lists Palaeolama paradoxa as an accepted species of the family Camelidae, which is the second source for the name.

Facts
Classification
Diet
Herbivore 1
System (Realm)
Terrestrial 1
Living or Extinct
No 1
Scientific Name
Palaeolama paradoxa 2
Conservation Status
Extinct 1
Connections

Child Taxon Of

Camelidae, Taxa
Source Palaeolama paradoxa (Paleobiology Database)
In the Other Atlases

Found In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.

Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Palaeolama paradoxaOccurrence record, place
Quote, Occurrence record, place
"cc": "UY"
Sources
1. Palaeolama paradoxa (Paleobiology Database)
  • Taxon record, extant status
    "is_extant": "extinct"
  • Ecospace record, environment
    "taxon_environment": "terrestrial"
  • Ecospace record, diet, taken from Camelidae
    "diet": "browser"
  • Child Taxon Of: Camelidae, Taxon record, classification family
    "family": "Camelidae"
  • In Group: Even-Toed Ungulates (Artiodactyla), Taxon record, classification order
    "order": "Artiodactyla"
View the Source
2. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility): GBIF Backbone Taxonomy match for Palaeolama paradoxa
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)Backbone match, canonical name
Quote, Backbone match, canonical name
"canonicalName": "Palaeolama paradoxa"
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.