Brachyopsigale dubius is an extinct mammal of the order Carnivora, placed by the Paleobiology Database in the skunk family Mephitidae and the genus Brachyopsigale. It was named by Hibbard in 1954, and the database gives his second contribution to the Rexroad Fauna as its primary reference. The database counts four fossil occurrences and dates its record from the Tortonian stage to the Calabrian stage, roughly 9.4 to 1.4 million years ago. Its ecospace record gives a terrestrial, ground-dwelling way of life and a carnivore and omnivore diet, values the database takes from the order Carnivora, since fossils of the species itself do not show how it fed. The GBIF backbone taxonomy lists the name as an accepted species but files the genus under the family Mustelidae, so the two sources differ on its family.
Facts
Classification
System (Realm) Living or Extinct Scientific Name Conservation Status Connections
Child Taxon Of
Source Brachyopsigale dubius (Paleobiology Database)
In the Other Atlases
Found In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject is found.
Source The Paleobiology Database: Occurrences of Brachyopsigale dubiusOccurrence record, country codeQuote, Occurrence record, country code
"cc": "US"
Sources
1. Brachyopsigale dubius (Paleobiology Database)
Taxon record, extant status (extinct)
"is_extant": "extinct"
Ecospace record, environment
"taxon_environment": "terrestrial"
Ecospace record, diet, taken from the order
"diet": "carnivore, omnivore"
Ecospace record, diet, omnivore value
"diet": "carnivore, omnivore"
Child Taxon Of: Mephitidae, Classification, family
"family": "Mephitidae"
In Group: Mustelids, Procyonids And Other Carnivorans, Classification, order
"order": "Carnivora"
View the Source2. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility): GBIF Backbone Taxonomy match for Brachyopsigale dubius
GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility)Backbone match, canonical nameQuote, Backbone match, canonical name
"canonicalName": "Brachyopsigale dubius"
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.